<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" >

<channel>
	<title>Sustainable development and much more &#187; Radioactivity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edouardstenger.com/tag/radioactivity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edouardstenger.com</link>
	<description>A selection of the latest headlines and best researches on sustainable development, climate change, cleantech and the world energy sector.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 05:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Think nuclear is dangerous ? Have a look at coal</title>
		<link>http://www.edouardstenger.com/2009/11/11/think-nuclear-is-dangerous-have-a-look-at-coal/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=think-nuclear-is-dangerous-have-a-look-at-coal</link>
		<comments>http://www.edouardstenger.com/2009/11/11/think-nuclear-is-dangerous-have-a-look-at-coal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edouard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal fly ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radioactivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elrst.com/?p=5730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is a well known fact, coal-fired plants are by far the most carbon dioxide intensive energy source. Now according to an article on Celsias coal ash is also much more radioactive than nuclear waste. The massive coal sludge accident in Tennessee last year showed that coal-fired plants can massively destroy ecosystems. This adds up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-469" src="http://www.elrst.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/coal-fired-plant03.thumbnail.jpg" alt="" width="128" height="128" />It is a well known fact, coal-fired plants are by far the most carbon dioxide intensive energy source. Now according to <a title=" Coal Fly Ash More Radioactive than Nuclear Waste" href="http://www.celsias.com/article/coal-fly-ash-100x-more-radioactive-nuclear-waste/" target="_blank">an article on Celsias</a> coal ash is also <a title="Coal Ash Is More Radioactive than Nuclear Waste" href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste" target="_blank">much more radioactive</a> than nuclear waste.<br />
<a title="A massive coal sludge accident in Tennessee" rel="bookmark" href="../2009/01/05/a-massive-coal-sludge-accident-in-tennessee/"></a></p>
<p><a title="A massive coal sludge accident in Tennessee" rel="bookmark" href="../2009/01/05/a-massive-coal-sludge-accident-in-tennessee/">The massive coal sludge accident in Tennessee </a>last year showed that <strong>coal-fired plants can massively destroy ecosystems</strong>. This adds up to the already well documented air and water pollution induced by such solutions.</p>
<p>It is high time we work on cutting coal consumption around the world. For example, decreasing<a title="America can cut its coal consumption by 62 %" rel="bookmark" href="../2009/02/23/america-can-cut-its-coal-consumption-by-62/"> American coal consumption by 62 %</a> is feasible. <span id="more-5730"></span></p>
<p>Similar results could be achieved in other countries with massive energy <a title="The huge potential of energy efficiency" rel="bookmark" href="../2009/01/19/the-huge-potential-of-energy-efficiency/">efficiency</a> measures. Of course renewables will play a large role in this.</p>
<p>I believe that all the people who believe we should phase out nuclear power plants as soon as possible should demand instead shutting down coal-fired plants.</p>
<p>Indeed, to sum it up :</p>
<p><strong>Coal</strong> is polluting our air, our water, contributes more than any other fossil fuel to climate change and is more radioactive than nuclear. The only thing it has for itself is that it&#8217;s cheap. Cheap because of the <a title="We still are funding fossil fuels industries" rel="bookmark" href="../2009/09/26/we-still-are-funding-fossil-fuels-industries/">huge incentives</a> and because there is no global price on carbon yet.</p>
<p><strong>Nuclear </strong>on the other hand pollutes much less, is less radioactive on top of being  one of the lowest emitting energy solutions. Waste and proliferation won&#8217;t be problems as future nuclear technologies will use current waste for electricity generation. See why I <a title="10 reasons to support nuclear power" rel="bookmark" href="../2009/10/26/10-reasons-to-support-nuclear-power/">support nuclear.</a></p>
<p>Related posts:</p><ol>
<li><a href='http://www.edouardstenger.com/2009/02/10/the-end-of-nuclear-waste-part-ii/' rel='bookmark' title='The end of nuclear waste ? Part II'>The end of nuclear waste ? Part II</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.edouardstenger.com/2008/01/11/uk-government-approved-the-building-of-nuclear-plants/' rel='bookmark' title='UK government approved the building of nuclear plants'>UK government approved the building of nuclear plants</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.edouardstenger.com/2007/06/06/australia-may-be-interested-by-nuclear-energy/' rel='bookmark' title='Australia may be interested by nuclear energy'>Australia may be interested by nuclear energy</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.edouardstenger.com/2009/11/09/an-overview-of-future-fission-nuclear-technologies/' rel='bookmark' title='An overview of future fission nuclear technologies'>An overview of future fission nuclear technologies</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.edouardstenger.com/2009/02/09/china-will-burn-coal-a-little-more-efficiently/' rel='bookmark' title='China will burn coal (a little) more efficiently'>China will burn coal (a little) more efficiently</a></li>
</ol>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edouardstenger.com/2009/11/11/think-nuclear-is-dangerous-have-a-look-at-coal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

